instant music
https://forum.pirouzu.net/

Rage Against the Machine
https://forum.pirouzu.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=891
Page 1 of 4

Author:  Jomei [ Tue Jun 28, 2005 3:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Rage Against the Machine

[img]http://www.mtv.de/artists/feed_img/rage_against_the_machine.jpg[/img]

I was listening to Audioslave yesterday, but I needed more balls, so I popped in Battle of Los Angeles.

I know there are other fans here.

Author:  overAmped [ Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

Battle of Los Angeles is definitely one of my favorite all-time albums.

Is Zach still doing solo work? The last I heard of him was something on the Fahrenheit 911 soundtrack I think.

Author:  Jomei [ Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:06 pm ]
Post subject: 

I heard that his solo stuff sucked. :|

Author:  StevenB130 [ Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:26 pm ]
Post subject: 

rage against the machine blows.

Author:  Jomei [ Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:32 pm ]
Post subject: 

Stealing avatars blows. Rage rocks so fucking hard. Just get used to it.

Author:  Replica [ Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:43 am ]
Post subject: 

I started a thread about this a while back, but nobody cared.

And yes, RATM is one of the most kickass bands out there. One of my top three.

Oh and JomeI, I have the "live at the grand olympic auditorium" dvd rip, if you want it. The amount of ass kicking in that mpeg, is [b]enormous.[/b]

Author:  thejedipunk [ Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:48 am ]
Post subject: 

They're good. But their validity fails due to them being on a major record label, despite the fact that it was to reach a wider audiance.

Author:  Replica [ Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:49 am ]
Post subject: 

[quote="thejedipunk"]They're good. But their validity fails due to them being on a major record label, despite the fact that it was to reach a wider audiance.[/quote]Wrong.

Author:  clouds [ Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:49 am ]
Post subject: 

haha. indie kids unite!

Author:  thejedipunk [ Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:52 am ]
Post subject: 

[quote="Replica"][quote="thejedipunk"]They're good. But their validity fails due to them being on a major record label, despite the fact that it was to reach a wider audiance.[/quote]Wrong.[/quote]

Explain.

I said that because it was what I had heard somewhere. I never actually followed their career. But I still stand by what I said about their validity and their record label.

Author:  clouds [ Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:53 am ]
Post subject: 

iyou can't base a band on their record label though.

Author:  thejedipunk [ Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:55 am ]
Post subject: 

I'm not actually. I think they made some good music and great points in their lyrics. But being someone who listen to political music, that is why I said that.

Author:  clouds [ Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:56 am ]
Post subject: 

ah, it's a whole different ball game when you get into that.

Author:  Replica [ Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:59 am ]
Post subject: 

It's wrong because they didn't just sing about activism and such, they actually partook (and stil do) in it.

Axis of justice, UNITE!, ect ect.

Record label doesn't mean shit.

Author:  thejedipunk [ Wed Jun 29, 2005 2:01 am ]
Post subject: 

I don't deny any of that. But that's just how I see them.

Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/