| instant music https://forum.pirouzu.net/ |
|
| Whose Better? https://forum.pirouzu.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2246 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Bubble Town Zoo Keeper [ Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Whose Better? |
The Pillows inspire me with there music such as the beatles also do. I love the pillows and I love the beatles but , who do you think is best? |
|
| Author: | lmd2131 [ Mon Sep 04, 2006 4:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
is that even a valid question? they play different music so its hard to compare them. they are in different time periods, different trends, different popular musical likings. so i dont know if this can be answered easily... |
|
| Author: | BadRedOx [ Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
This isn't a really good question to answer... |
|
| Author: | Biscuit Hammer [ Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Whose Better? |
[quote="Bubble Town Zoo Keeper"]The Pillows inspire me with there music such as the beatles also do. I love the pillows and I love the beatles but , who do you think is best?[/quote] the pillows are better because they're all still alive. |
|
| Author: | thejedipunk [ Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
As much as I am not into the Beatles, you can't really compare the two. The pillows were inspired by the Beatles, this much is true. But the Beatles' music was the music of a generation. Practically the whole world was listening to them at their peak. However, the pillows have not even scratched the surface here in America. Yes they had incredible turn out at their shows. But not alot of people know them. They are still not that well known in their native Japan. Yes they have had a few hits, but very sporadic. Songs by the Beatles were chart busters left and right. Their influence is far reaching as well. Every single band that came after them have all claimed influence by the Beatles. Compared to the Beatles did and accomplished, they are meh. |
|
| Author: | Jomei [ Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Japan is superior. pillows win by default, therefore. |
|
| Author: | Tatsu-Kun [ Tue Sep 05, 2006 4:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
The Beatles win this one. |
|
| Author: | lastdino [ Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
As the others said, this isn't really a fair question...but I will say this: the pillows are way underappreciated in their J-pop loving homeland... |
|
| Author: | terra [ Tue Sep 05, 2006 2:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
hmm... were the beatles an immediate hit? or did they toil in obscurity for a while before making it big? |
|
| Author: | Tatsu-Kun [ Tue Sep 05, 2006 3:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
They toiled in Hamburg D: But it didn't take 15 years for them to become the biggest band on the planet. |
|
| Author: | [Mr. Lostman] [ Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
They are both equally good, but The Beatles didn't have Shinichiro. |
|
| Author: | sheerheartattack [ Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
You're talking about the most overrated and the most underrated bands of the past 50 years. So I suppose they even each other out. |
|
| Author: | kudos anyone? [ Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
primus. |
|
| Author: | Marekenshin [ Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote="sheerheartattack"]You're talking about the most overrated and the most underrated bands of the past 50 years. So I suppose they even each other out.[/quote] sounds good. but, yes, this question is really unanswerable. it's like, "hey, who was a better musician, bach, or van halen?" |
|
| Author: | Yoshi [ Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
STFU!!1!!one Beatles are teh best. The Pillows are really good but come on its a simple answer The Beatles beat The Pillows, its sad but true. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|