Reply to topic  [ 549 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 37  Next
Ging Nang Boyz 
Author Message
stalker
stalker
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 5:25 pm
Posts: 617
Location: still Chicago
Post 
[quote]Get over the fact that it's garagey and listen to the bloody music, wanks.[/quote]

Get over the fact that someone doesn't like one of your favorite bands.

Their "garage sound" is a non-issue for me. I love garage rock, but there is a difference between simple music with low production values and shitty, abrasive song writing.

I don't give a shit if people like them, but I don't. And, it's not because I “can't handle their style”.


Sun Jul 10, 2005 5:31 pm
Profile
Dances with Wolves
Dances with Wolves
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 3451
Post 
heh. I see why people wouldn't like them. And why they would. SO IT'S ALL FINE WITH ME.

_________________
'It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first.' - Ronald Reagan


Sun Jul 10, 2005 5:33 pm
Profile
vain dog
vain dog
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:37 am
Posts: 338
Post 
It's definitely true that some of the bands in the "neo-garage" movement are making bands like The Sonics roll over in the respective, largely non-existant graves.


Sun Jul 10, 2005 5:36 pm
Profile
stalker
stalker
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 5:25 pm
Posts: 617
Location: still Chicago
Post 
[quote="StevenB130"][size=200]PUNK BLOWS[/size][/quote]

Actually, I can respect this. There are plenty of good, innovative, and rather listenable punk and garage bands, but so much of it really does suck.

Punk, in an extremely general sense, is way too focused on message, image, and ethic… as opposed to not sounding like shit. For a genre that was partly a reaction to the absurd posturing of metal, punk itself is ridiculously obsessed with appearance over sound. Also, punk constantly repeats itself, and has managed to sound exactly the same for a couple of decades. Not that this would be a bad thing... if it had sounded good in the first place.

Like I said there are plenty of good punk bands, but according to the "true punks" and all the cocky purists, that stuff really isn't punk at all. I suppose unless they are devoted to some convoluted political ideal, British, and sound like shit, than they aren't punk.

EDIT:
[quote]It's definitely true that some of the bands in the "neo-garage" movement are making bands like The Sonics roll over in the respective, largely non-existant graves.[/quote]
agreed, but there are some doing them justice too.


Sun Jul 10, 2005 5:54 pm
Profile
vain dog
vain dog
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:37 am
Posts: 338
Post 
Yeah. I consider bands like Television and Iggy and The Stooges to be be punk. But punk in the spiky, mohawky sense is pretty retarded.


Sun Jul 10, 2005 5:59 pm
Profile
stalker
stalker
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 5:25 pm
Posts: 617
Location: still Chicago
Post 
[quote="TuffGhost"]Yeah. I consider bands like Television and Iggy and The Stooges to be be punk. But punk in the spiky, mohawky sense is pretty retarded.[/quote]

It gets kinda confusing to me. Every time a critic or writer calls one of them punk I always go "wow they don't sound like punk".

I've always though of the stooges to be more of a garage band, like mc5 or the new york dolls(whom I love). I have no idea what to call television. They were definitley part of the "scene" but they sound so different.

I really like the wave of punk that was bookended by husker du and fugazi.

If that was even punk.


Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:09 pm
Profile
vain dog
vain dog
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:37 am
Posts: 338
Post 
I'm with you about Fugazi and Husker Du. I think I'd call them post-punk, but then again post-punk is a sort of confusing categorization in the first place. Pere Ubu, for example were playing "post-punk" music before punk even existed. I've always considered The Stooges to be a punk band. I mean, the term "punk" was supposedly coined in Rolling Stone's review of Funhouse.

All of these massive categorizations of music are nonsense anyway. Things would be so much easier if everyone didn't have to hear "post-indie avantcore synth-wave" every ten minutes.


Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:15 pm
Profile
stalker
stalker
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 5:25 pm
Posts: 617
Location: still Chicago
Post 
[quote="TuffGhost"]I'm with you about Fugazi and Husker Du. I think I'd call them post-punk, but then again post-punk is a sort of confusing categorization in the first place. Pere Ubu, for example were playing "post-punk" music before punk even existed. I've always considered The Stooges to be a punk band. I mean, the term "punk" was supposedly coined in Rolling Stone's review of Funhouse.

All of these massive categorizations of music are nonsense anyway. Things would be so much easier if everyone didn't have to hear "post-indie avantcore synth-wave" every ten minutes.[/quote]

I'm going to start a band and demmand that we be classified as "post-indie avantcore synth-wave".

It gets ridiculous when writers are arbitrarily handing out new genres every other week, but I think there is a need to accuratley categorize music. The problems start when we begin describing music based on the whim of some pretentious critic, or a bands minor deviation from an already established genre. all the post/proto/core crap is annoying as hell but if everyone just labeled shit based on it's general sound, there wouldn't be so much confusion.

I guess the reason I want to label music is to make the distinction between a band like the stooges and a band like the sex-pistols. They're both called "punk" but don't have the same sound. On the other hand: why should that bother me? As obtuse as it all seems, I think it's an interesting aspect of music.


Sun Jul 10, 2005 10:18 pm
Profile
premium buster
premium buster

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 1014
Post 
[quote="Catfish"]Punk, in an extremely general sense, is way too focused on message, image, and ethic… as opposed to not sounding like shit. For a genre that was partly a reaction to the absurd posturing of metal, punk itself is ridiculously obsessed with appearance over sound. Also, punk constantly repeats itself, and has managed to sound exactly the same for a couple of decades. Not that this would be a bad thing... if it had sounded good in the first place.[/quote]
Yeah, that pretty much sums it up. In general, I can't stand any music that's about style over substance.

On GNB, I haven't heard enough to make a judgement. I've only heard 2 songs, and neither really impressed me.


Mon Jul 11, 2005 3:56 am
Profile
stalker
stalker
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 12:24 pm
Posts: 793
Post 
Ging Nang Boyz is definetly a band I can see why many people would dislike. I personally do not listen to any other "punk" music - nor do I really even consider GNB to be terribly "punk"ish anyway. I love them, though - they're awesome as fuck - energetic, wild and talented guys who have a bloody good time.


Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:28 pm
Profile
Dances with Wolves
Dances with Wolves
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 3451
Post 
jazzcore, now that's a genre nobody has capitalized on.

_________________
'It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first.' - Ronald Reagan


Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:49 pm
Profile
Doutei So Young
Doutei So Young
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 6:29 pm
Posts: 1783
Post 
If nothing else, I can respect GNB for the whole dIY approach it seems they take - just set up mics next to the instruments and play your heart out. Sure the sound quality ends up not being great, but that's part of the game. I can definitely see why they wouldn't appeal to everyone, I only listen to them in small doses myself.


Tue Jul 12, 2005 10:34 pm
Profile
vain dog
vain dog
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:37 am
Posts: 338
Post 
[quote="clouds drive monster"]jazzcore, now that's a genre nobody has capitalized on.[/quote]

John Zorn's Naked City


Tue Jul 12, 2005 11:20 pm
Profile
Dances with Wolves
Dances with Wolves
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 3451
Post 
I'm going to have to check this out, because I only know one other band, earthsuit, which has fit into this genre.

_________________
'It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first.' - Ronald Reagan


Tue Jul 12, 2005 11:39 pm
Profile
tiny buster
tiny buster

Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:39 pm
Posts: 5
Location: Germany
Post 
i love GOING STEADY!

_________________
Diese welt wird mit den erschreckenden und erfüllensachen gefüllt.


Wed Jul 13, 2005 11:24 pm
Profile ICQ
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 549 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 37  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.