| instant music https://forum.pirouzu.net/ |
|
| Classics https://forum.pirouzu.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1079 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | thejedipunk [ Tue Aug 09, 2005 2:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Classics |
This is something that I have been pondering for a few days now. Perhaps the only way for the pillows to save their asses from bitchy fans like ones found here is (taking consideration that they don't change their current style) playing shows full of the classics. Kinda like those Pixies shows that recently passed us. Problem is, where do you place the classics cut off year? 2002 or 1999? IMO, I think 2001 would be best. Just to include ROSS and I think I can. Discuss. |
|
| Author: | wired_musac [ Tue Aug 09, 2005 2:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Classics - 1990-1995. Golden Age - 1997-2000 (or even Smile) WUT THE??? - 2003-2004 |
|
| Author: | Marekenshin [ Tue Aug 09, 2005 5:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
classics = 1990 - 1997 |
|
| Author: | discovolante [ Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Classics |
[quote="thejedipunk"]Perhaps the only way for the pillows to save their asses from bitchy fans like ones found here is (taking consideration that they don't change their current style) playing shows full of the classics. Kinda like those Pixies shows that recently passed us.[/quote] Only if they did a set of B-sides, too, like the Pixies. Man, I'd pay for both. |
|
| Author: | Josher [ Tue Aug 09, 2005 10:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The Good Times - 1990-1997 New Age - 1998-2002 Depression - 2003-Present |
|
| Author: | schmatzee [ Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote="wired_musac"]Classics - 1990-1995. Golden Age - 1997-2000 (or even Smile) WUT THE??? - 2003-2004[/quote] i agree with this one. Except i really don't find their new stuff bad. I would still go to their shows if they only played PL and Good Dreams songs. There's nothing really wrong with them, they just aren't quite as good. |
|
| Author: | Jomei [ Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote="Josher"]The Good Times - 1990-1997 New Age - 1998-2002 Depression - 2003-Present[/quote] Economically speaking, that means they should be making a recovery soon and prosper again thereafter. |
|
| Author: | wired_musac [ Wed Aug 10, 2005 12:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
What do we do about this dilemma? Should we bomb the official site's BBS with matters about older stuff? or try to deliver the message to Chie Arai? Draw a petition full of fans interested in shows with the older stuff? |
|
| Author: | thejedipunk [ Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
First things first: Cut the emo out of the picture. |
|
| Author: | Sawao Yamanaka™ [ Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote="thejedipunk"]First things first: Cut the emo out of the picture.[/quote] I'm guessing there was a pun intended there. |
|
| Author: | discovolante [ Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Actually, the hidden "5th" member (Sawao, Sato, Manabe, and Ueda are the only official members, I guess no on likes Tatsuya or Jun) is Kanazawa Imo (pronounced "ee-moh"). You can unlock him by playing your pillows album on a PS2 and pressing O, X, O, X, UP, DOWN, LEFT, RIGHT, Select, Start, R2+R1, L2+L1, Start. The code should generally be entered before the first guitar solo on the album, otherwise it probably won't work. Just for those not yet oriented, he's the worst theremin player in Japan and jedi is right: they should cut his ass out of the band. |
|
| Author: | schmatzee [ Wed Aug 10, 2005 11:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
that doesnt really fit into this thread....what the hell |
|
| Author: | Josher [ Wed Aug 10, 2005 11:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote="Jomei"][quote="Josher"]The Good Times - 1990-1997 New Age - 1998-2002 Depression - 2003-Present[/quote] Economically speaking, that means they should be making a recovery soon and prosper again thereafter.[/quote] NONFICTION looks promising... that's why. |
|
| Author: | wired_musac [ Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote="Josher"][quote="Jomei"][quote="Josher"]The Good Times - 1990-1997 New Age - 1998-2002 Depression - 2003-Present[/quote] Economically speaking, that means they should be making a recovery soon and prosper again thereafter.[/quote] NONFICTION looks promising... that's why.[/quote] Nonfiction would be the first of a gradual recovery? or is it a Bismarck? (just having fun.. don't reply) |
|
| Author: | discovolante [ Wed Aug 10, 2005 3:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote="schmatzee"]that doesnt really fit into this thread....what the hell[/quote] cry me a river. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|